Complexity Results for Paraconsistent Inference Relations

نویسندگان

  • Sylvie Coste-Marquis
  • Pierre Marquis
چکیده

In this paper, the complexity of several paraconsistent inference relations, based on multivalued logics, is investigated. Many inference relations pointed out so far by Arieli and Avron, Besnard and Schaub, D’Ottaviano and da Costa, Frisch, Levesque, Priest are considered from the computational side. All these relations can be gathered into two categories: the basic ones stem directly from the notions of models within 3 or 4-valued logics, while the refined ones are based on notions of preferred models for such logics. Completing complexity results by Cadoli and Schaerf (centered on the basic relations), we show that the refined paraconsistent inference relations that have been defined in the framework of multivalued logics are highly intractable. Especially, we prove that the inference problems corresponding to these relations are Πp2complete, even in the simple case where the database is a CNF formula and the query is a propositional symbol.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Paraconsistent Inference and Preservation

The study of paraconsistent inference is the study of inference which prohibits reasoning from inconsistent premises to arbitrary conclusions. In this paper we examine a family of syntax based paraconsistent inference relations and introduce a novel way to study and compare these relations in terms of their preservational properties.

متن کامل

A Unit Resolution-Based Approach to Tractable and Paraconsistent Reasoning

A family of unit resolution-based paraconsistent inference relations `Σ for propositional logic in the clausal case is introduced. Parameter Σ is any consistent set of clauses representing the beliefs which are intended to be exploited through full deduction, i.e., every classical consequence of Σ must be kept w.r.t. `Σ, whatever the belief base B. Contrariwise to many paraconsistent inference ...

متن کامل

Paraconsistent Reasoning via Quantified Boolean Formulas, I: Axiomatising Signed Systems

Signed systems were introduced as a general, syntax-independent framework for paraconsistent reasoning, that is, non-trivialised reasoning from inconsistent information. In this paper, we show how the family of corresponding paraconsistent consequence relations can be axiomatised by means of quantified Boolean formulas. This approach has several benefits. First, it furnishes an axiomatic specif...

متن کامل

Models and Sets Dynamics, Interaction and Nonmonotonicity Paraconsistent Reasoning via Quantified Boolean Formulas, I: Axiomatising Signed Systems

Signed systems were introduced as a general, syntaxindependent framework for paraconsistent reasoning, that is, nontrivialised reasoning from inconsistent information. In this paper, we show how the family of corresponding paraconsistent consequence relations can be axiomatised by means of quantified Boolean formulas. This approach has several benefits. First, it furnishes an axiomatic specific...

متن کامل

Recovering Consistency by Forgetting Inconsistency

In this paper, we introduce and study a new paraconsistent inference relation |=c in the setting of 3-valued paraconsistent logics. Using inconsistency forgetting as a key mechanism for recovering consistency, it guarantees that the deductive closure Cn|=c(Σ) of any belief base Σ is classically consistent and classically closed. This strong feature, not shared by previous inference relations in...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002